Delta Objects to the DOT Terms for Maintaining the SEA-Haneda Route

While Delta originally thanked the DOT for its decision to allow the airline to continue SEA-HND fights, they are now strongly protesting the set terms. Here’s their statement from early last week:

At the most basic level, the proposed condition deviates from past practice because, as far as Delta is aware, the department has never previously imposed such a strict 365-day-a-year service requirement. Any two days of non-service in a seven-day period would summarily strip Delta of slot authority. Faced with that exacting threat, the condition would create improper incentives to maintain scheduled service at all costs, when flights might otherwise be canceled, delayed, or rescheduled out of safety or other operational concerns.

Of course, American thinks the DOT should enforce it’s requirement:

Undoubtedly, Delta will request the department eliminate or reduce these necessary safeguards on its use of the Seattle-Haneda slot pair. The more Delta protests these safeguards, the more skeptical the department should be of Delta’s willingness to abide by its daily year-round service commitment.

For full details see – DOT: Delta Can Keep SEA-HND…but it’s AA’s if the flight isn’t operated daily!

Comments

  1. Booked the LAX-CGK deal and added a SEA leg in the hopes of a schedule change…looking like that extra $14 may have been well spent afterall.

  2. I’d have to double-check the various filings, but I believe that it is an ‘intended to operate’ clause rather than ‘must operate’. For example: crippling storm leaves Seattle airport closed for 3 days. Delta is able to cancel the flight as they intended to operate it but were not able to due to circumstances beyond their control. What the clause prevents is Delta scheduling the flight on a less than daily basis.

  3. Poor Delta they are turning into the real “whiners” of the US aviation industry.

    First Anderson puts his foot in his mouth about the Mid Eastern carriers simply because they provide real service, modern airplanes rather than rehashed 767’s and really bland AB’s

    I sincerely hope they lose this route and AA takes it. AA has superior service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *