Starwood Battle Continues – Anbang Raises Offer, “Superior Proposal” to Marriott

by Adam

It’s back on! Anbang has increased their offer for Starwood hotels to $82.75 in cash per share, a level that the Board feels is superior to Marriott’s revised offer.  The board will convene today as previously scheduled, but will immediately adjourn the meeting until April 8th. Anbang’s updated offer is $4.75 per share higher than the Consortium’s prior binding proposal on March 18, 2016. The “superior proposal” designation “allows Starwood to engage in discussions with and provide diligence information to the consortium in connection with its proposal”. However, Starwood still notes that currently the Board has not changed its recommendation in support of the merger with Marriott. From the PR:

Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. today announced that its Board of Directors, in consultation with its legal and financial advisors, determined that a revised, non-binding proposal from a consortium consisting of Anbang Insurance Group Co., Ltd., J.C. Flowers & Co. and Primavera Capital Limited (the “Consortium”) is reasonably likely to lead to a “Superior Proposal” as defined in Starwood’s merger agreement with Marriott International, Inc.

On March 26, 2016, Starwood received a non-binding proposal from the Consortium, under which the Consortium would acquire all of the outstanding shares of Starwood common stock for $81.00 per share in cash. Starwood’s Board, in consultation with its legal and financial advisors, determined that this proposal is reasonably likely to lead to a “Superior Proposal,” allowing Starwood to engage in discussions with, and provide diligence information to, the Consortium in connection with its proposal. Starwood commenced discussions with the Consortium on March 26, 2016 and, in those discussions, the Consortium made a revised proposal with an increased purchase price of $82.75 in cash per share of Starwood common stock. Starwood and the Consortium are continuing to discuss non-price terms related to the Consortium’s revised proposal, and are working to finalize the other terms of a binding proposal from the Consortium, including definitive documentation.

The Starwood Board, in consultation with its legal and financial advisors, will carefully consider the outcome of its discussions with the Consortium in order to determine the course of action that is in the best interest of Starwood and its stockholders. There can be no assurance that discussions will result in a binding proposal from the Consortium, that the Starwood Board will determine that any such proposal is a “Superior Proposal” or that a transaction with the Consortium will be approved or consummated on any particular terms or at all.

Under the terms of the Consortium’s current, revised proposal, the Consortium would acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Starwood for $82.75 per share in cash, an increase of $4.75 per share from the Consortium’s prior binding proposal on March 18, 2016. Pursuant to separate agreements previously entered into by Starwood, Starwood stockholders would receive additional consideration in the form of Interval Leisure Group common stock from the spin-off of its vacation ownership business, Vistana Signature Experiences, and subsequent merger with ILG, currently valued at $5.91 per Starwood share, based on ILG’s share price as of market close on March 24, 2016 (the “ILG Transaction”). On this basis, the Consortium proposal and the ILG transaction have a combined current value of $88.66 per share.

As previously announced, Starwood intends to convene its stockholder meeting to consider the merger with Marriott on March 28, 2016, and immediately adjourn the meeting until April 8, 2016. Starwood’s Board has not changed its recommendation in support of Starwood’s merger with Marriott.

Starwood Le Meriden

The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Related Articles

2 comments

Ed C March 28, 2016 - 10:14 am

IMO This bidding war is actually overall bad for SPG people. The higher the bids, the bigger ROI they expect and hence I think SPG will suffer in the long term no matter what happens.

Reply
Victor fox March 29, 2016 - 12:01 pm

The deal with Marriott will lead to reduced SPG benefits and as a lifetime platinum member I will switch to another brand immediately. Since the announcement of the proposed merger I have tried numerous Marriott hotels and they don’t come close to SPG.

Reply

Leave a Reply to Ed C Cancel Reply