A new study suggests that airlines could cut boarding time by seating passengers based on how many carry-on bags they are bringing on board. From the LA Times:
The study from Clarkson University School of Business in New York recognizes that a lot of boarding time is wasted as passengers shuffle around the cabin looking for space to stow their carry-on bags in the overhead compartment. Under a boarding method suggested by R. John Milne, an assistant professor of engineering management, passengers are seated from the back of the plane to the front and from the windows to the aisles. Milne adds another wrinkle: He also suggests airlines seat passengers in a way that spreads the carry-on luggage throughout the plane. In each row, the airline would seat at least one passenger with two bags, one passenger with one bag and one passenger with no bags. “So now you don’t have delays where people are trying to cram all their luggage in the overhead compartment,” Milne said in an interview.
Milne’s study found that this boarding method can cut seating time by an average of 3% compared with a back-to-front boarding scheme. For a large carrier the process could save as much as $10 million a year, according to his study, published this month in the Journal of Air Transport Management. So far, the boarding process has been tested only on a computer simulator, and Milne said he hasn’t offered the idea to any airline.
Hmm, I don’t know about boarding by carry-on bag. First off, airlines would have to implement a system to input the number of carry-on bags each passenger has. Secondly, that number can change after check-in as passengers shop for duty free items or remove smaller bags from larger bags after security. Finally, if the airlines simply enforced their carry-on rules, each passenger would be limited to the same number of carry-on bags anyway.
- Will American’s New Boarding Process Work? It Failed at Virgin America…
- Speedy Boarding – Sliding Seats Coming Soon?
- The Airlines’ Endless Quest for Better Boarding
The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.